I very much doubt this was a deliberate choice on the Ministry's part, what. It's either a malfunction or a mistake.
Either way, one must assume they know they've lifted the restriction and are working to restore it. And if they haven't noticed, as you say, using greater numbers openly would only alert them to their error.
I say, I wonder if it's to do with restoring monitoring over the summer? But that could mean we've had the ability to write to more than two people for months, and never known it until now.
Anyway there are busybodies out there who'd want to be included on all sorts of PMs if it were a possibility. So in a way it's just as well no one else knows.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:15 am (UTC)What's up?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:18 am (UTC)I wonder how many people we can get in? I mean eventually you start to run out of space on the page.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:18 am (UTC)I say, that's well brilliant!
Why is it happening?
More to the point, dare we use it outside the Order? I suspect it's not the sort of advantage we want to let the Ministry know we have, what.
-Justin
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:20 am (UTC)Maybe they don't know it's happening. We wouldn't want them noticing, would we?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:24 am (UTC)Yes, I quite agree.
I very much doubt this was a deliberate choice on the Ministry's part, what. It's either a malfunction or a mistake.
Either way, one must assume they know they've lifted the restriction and are working to restore it. And if they haven't noticed, as you say, using greater numbers openly would only alert them to their error.
I say, I wonder if it's to do with restoring monitoring over the summer? But that could mean we've had the ability to write to more than two people for months, and never known it until now.
-Justin
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:26 am (UTC)