I very much doubt this was a deliberate choice on the Ministry's part, what. It's either a malfunction or a mistake.
Either way, one must assume they know they've lifted the restriction and are working to restore it. And if they haven't noticed, as you say, using greater numbers openly would only alert them to their error.
I say, I wonder if it's to do with restoring monitoring over the summer? But that could mean we've had the ability to write to more than two people for months, and never known it until now.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2014-10-04 04:24 am (UTC)Yes, I quite agree.
I very much doubt this was a deliberate choice on the Ministry's part, what. It's either a malfunction or a mistake.
Either way, one must assume they know they've lifted the restriction and are working to restore it. And if they haven't noticed, as you say, using greater numbers openly would only alert them to their error.
I say, I wonder if it's to do with restoring monitoring over the summer? But that could mean we've had the ability to write to more than two people for months, and never known it until now.
-Justin